Posted by Joke at 9:43 PM
Poppy Buxom posted at 12:33 AM, March 20, 2006
Fix that solecism or the 25th Drivelversary bash is off!
And I don't mean the sartorial one.
Poppy Buxom posted at 8:15 AM, March 20, 2006
Joke posted at 5:04 PM, March 20, 2006
You have excellent smithers yourself.
Badger posted at 10:41 PM, March 20, 2006
I love it when y'all start in with the dirty talk.
Lazy cow posted at 8:29 AM, March 21, 2006
Seersucker? Seersucker? Isn't that the fabric little girls' gingham dresses are made from? :-)
--erica posted at 10:39 AM, March 21, 2006
julia posted at 1:46 PM, March 21, 2006
Searsucker? Ooooooo-k. I thought that was what little boys wore for their Easter outfits. Searsucker short trousers and a blue blazer.
Joke posted at 3:59 PM, March 21, 2006
No, it's for gentlemen who need wear a suit in the swelter of a subtropical summer.
The problem with seersucker suits has traditionally been the tailoring (or lack thereof), so they look as if the wearer stores them not in a closet, but in a bottle.
Lastly, often one finds that blizzard white and wedgwood blue combination which is unflattering to most men. I opt for ivory and navy.
Poppy Buxom posted at 12:01 PM, March 23, 2006
I've got no problem with seersucker, even of the blizzard white and wedgwood blue ilk. You know that.
But here's something I've been wondering for a long time: what have you got against the use of the word "to" when you're using an infinitive? You like to leave it out, and I'd like to know why.
I figure you're scrimping on prepositions so you can spend more on seersucker suits. Or adjectives. Am I right?